Commonwealth v. Newsome
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
¶ 1 Appellant, Scott James Newsome, appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed following his conviction for driving while under the influence of alcohol while blood alcohol content is 0.10% or greater in violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3731(a)(4)® 1 . Appellant’s sole issue on appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his drunk driving conviction. We affirm.
¶ 2 The trial court accurately summarized the evidence as follows:
[T]he testimony presented at trial indicated that Trooper Christopher Ma-guire of the Pennsylvania State Police observed defendant traveling [s]outh on Rt.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. MoralesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. PriceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. MichuckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. WannerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KarnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Easlick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
- Commonwealth v. KohlieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- In the Interest of: C.E.H., a MinorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. BruggerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.