Legal Opinion

Perry v. Robertson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1988No. C000253PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to tax costs. Renae Perry obtained a favorable verdict in an action against the defendants, real estate brokers and salespersons, asserting liability for inadequate compensation received for the sale of her house attributable to their negligence in drafting the written sales agreement. The defendants acted for Perry under a written listing agreement which provided: “If action be instituted to enforce this agreement, the prevailing party shall receive reasonable attorney’s fees and costs as fixed by the Court.” Perry filed a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Stout v. TurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Chelini v. NieriCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Walters v. MarlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Eads v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. North American Chemical Co. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Exxess Electronixx v. Heger Realty Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Lerner v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Jackson v. Rogers & WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Crow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API