Auger v. City of New Bedford
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
In the Superior Court the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiffs’ amended declaration was sustained. The plaintiffs appealed from the order, “Judgment for the defendant.”
The first count sets out that the plaintiffs were mortgagees of certain real estate in New Bedford; that the mortgagor was one Bindas; that default was made by the mortgagor, and the plaintiffs, on September 23, 1927, “took possession of said land for the purpose of foreclosing said mortgage”; that the collector of taxes for the defendant city advertised the land for sale September 29, 1927, for nonpayment of taxes for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- F. W. Stock & Sons v. SnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Graton v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Graton v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
3Cited by8 opinions
- Morash & Sons, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- City of San Angelo v. DeutschTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Kurtigian v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Sherman v. Rent Control Board of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Black v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.