Graton v. City of Cambridge
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
This is an action brought under'the provision of G. L. c. 60, § 98, to recover back a tax paid under protest. The court sustained a demurrer to the declaration in three counts, all for the same cause of action. The plaintiff appealed to this court, Samuel v. Page-Storms Drop Forge Co. 243 Mass. 133. G. L. c. 231, § 96.
The facts set out in the declaration or incorporated therein by reference are that the plaintiff, about to purchase a piece of real estate in Cambridge, Massachusetts, free and clear of all incumbrances, including municipal liens, under the provisions of St. 1909, c. 490, Part…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Lorillard v. . the Town of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Samuel v. Page-Storms Drop Forge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of San Angelo v. DeutschTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Meenes v. GoldbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Cheraska v. OhanasianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Hardman v. Collector of Taxes of North AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Auger v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.