Legal Opinion

Graton v. City of Cambridge

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 25, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action brought under'the provision of G. L. c. 60, § 98, to recover back a tax paid under protest. The court sustained a demurrer to the declaration in three counts, all for the same cause of action. The plaintiff appealed to this court, Samuel v. Page-Storms Drop Forge Co. 243 Mass. 133. G. L. c. 231, § 96.

The facts set out in the declaration or incorporated therein by reference are that the plaintiff, about to purchase a piece of real estate in Cambridge, Massachusetts, free and clear of all incumbrances, including municipal liens, under the provisions of St. 1909, c. 490, Part…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Lorillard v. . the Town of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. Samuel v. Page-Storms Drop Forge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of San Angelo v. DeutschTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Meenes v. GoldbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  3. Cheraska v. OhanasianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  4. Hardman v. Collector of Taxes of North AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Auger v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API