Legal Opinion
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 1, 2004No. A103835PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SWAGER, J.
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (hereafter PCRM) appeals an order granting the motion of defendant and respondent Tyson Foods, Inc. (hereafter Tyson) pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 to strike four causes of action of PCRM’s complaint. We reverse.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In a suit for injunctive relief, PCRM alleges that Tyson made false and deceptive representations about chicken products that it sold to consumers in California. PCRM alleges it is a nonprofit health-advocacy organization, which claims to have 24,000 members in the state. Tyson is…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Regan v. Taxation With Representation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Batzel v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Blanchard v. DirecTV, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Rio Linda Union School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- United Tactical Systems, LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Foundation for Taxpayer & Consumer Rights v. GaramendiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.