Legal Opinion

Mason v. Rizzi

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 3, 2004No. 339, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Justice:

In this appeal, consolidated with Eskin v. Carden, 842 A.2d 1222 (Del.Supr.2004), we again address the nature and scope of the admissibility of biomechanical expert testimony related to a motor vehicle accident alleged to have caused personal injuries to a particular plaintiff.1 We also review the trial judge’s decision to enter a partial judgment as a matter of law2 on the question of whether the accident caused a “soft-tissue” injury, as well as the trial judge’s discretionary ruling to allow Plaintiff/Appellee’s medical experts *34to testify by pretrial video deposition…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Eskin v. CardenSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  3. DeAngelis v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. John Fritz v. William YeagerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  5. Maier v. SantucciSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bertola v. Fisher-PriceSuperior Court of Delaware · 2025
  2. Brown v. Fisher-Price, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2024
  3. Lee v. HolbrookSuperior Court of Delaware · 2021
  4. Smith v. Grief & Harry's Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API