Legal Opinion

Rummens v. Hillman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1924No. 18571Published

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered October 29, 1923, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Rummens, commenced this action in the superior court for King county, seeking recovery of compensation for legal services rendered by him as attorney for the defendants Hillman and wife, claiming such services to have resulted to the advantage of defendants to the extent of hundreds of thousands of dollars in value, and that $25,000 is a reasonable compensation therefor, in addition to a *563retainer of $500 agreed to be paid, and partly paid, at tbe beginning of tbe employment. A trial upon tbe merits before the court, sitting without a jury, resulted in findings and judgment in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gordon v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Gordon v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Gordon v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State ex rel. Progressive Motion Picture Co. v. HowellWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Hillman v. GordonWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API