Legal Opinion

Coubrough v. Adams

California Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1886No. 9450PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

This is an action to recover the amount alleged to be due on a promissory note executed by the defendant’s testator to the order of McFarlane, Blair & Co., and by them indorsed to the plaintiff.

The complaint is in the usual form, setting forth a copy of the note, and was filed in the District Court of the third judicial district for Alameda County on the twenty-eighth day of June, 1876.

The defendant answered to the complaint, setting up the circumstances under which the note was given, and alleging that it was indorsed to plaintiff after its maturity, and had been fully, paid.

At…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ayres v. BensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Lestrade v. BarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Dettenborn v. Hartford-National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  3. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Leonard v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Vick v. GrasserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API