Legal Opinion
Nibali v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 13, 1980No. 207-74PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, Judge
This civilian pay case is before us on plaintiffs petition for attorney fees, all other issues being disposed of. On December 13, 1978, this court rendered its decision on the merits holding for plaintiff. Nibali v. United States, 218 Ct. CL 547, 589 F.2d 514 (1978). The case was remanded to the trial division for a determination of quantum. The parties agreed to a stipulation which the trial judge recognized on October 19, 1978, in returning this case to the appellate division. His report stated that the stipulation reserved for our determination plaintiffs claim to attorney fees against the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Fidelity Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Brookfield Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Brenda Bennett v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Michael Zumerling v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Nunes-Correia v. HaigDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.