Legal Opinion

Bacall v. Shumway

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 2021No. B302787Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 2/18/21; certified for publication 3/16/21 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT MICHAEL BACALL et al., B302787 Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC674035) v. JEFFREY SHUMWAY et al., Defendants and Appellants. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Ruth Ann Kwan, Judge. Affirmed. Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath; Fitzgerald Legal Consult and James E. Fitzgerald for Defendants and Appellants. Freedman + Taitelman, Bryan J. Freedman and Sean M. Hardy for Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Richey v. Autonation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API