Legal Opinion

Chancellor v. Tenneco Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 19, 1982No. 54340PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Vice Chief Justice:

This action was instituted in this court for certiorari to review a decision of the Court of Appeals, Division No. 2, reversing the decision of the District Court of Woods County which held that a pooling order by the Corporation Commission was binding on the lessee of oil and gas interests who took said lease after commencement of the pooling proceedings and where notice of the proceeding was timely given to lessee’s grantor.

The facts are that Earl Chancellor, appellant, commenced his action against Tenneco Oil Company, appellee, in the District Court of Woods…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scoufos v. FullerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Snow v. WinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Gulfstream Petroleum Corp. v. LaydenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of the Land Office v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Littlefield v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Harry R. Carlile Trust v. Cotton Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Tenneco Oil Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Mullins v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. James Energy Co. v. HCG Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Kaneb Production Co. v. GHK Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API