Legal Opinion
Nabaya v. Dudeck
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 28, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1912PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya, proceeding pro se, alleges that the actions of defendant John Dudeck, Jr., formerly an attorney with the Department of Justice Tax Division, violated his rights under the United States Constitution. See Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (“Compl.”) at 8-9. 1 This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(5), and (b)(6) (“Def.’s Mot.”) and the plaintiffs motions to amend his complaint and for recusal of the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Securities Industry & Financial Markets Ass'n v. United States Commodity Futures Trading CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Atchison v. U.S. District CourtsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Lemma v. Hispanic Nat'l Bar Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bernier v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Ajisafe v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.