Legal Opinion

Haugh v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1895No. 1814PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by'

Gordon, J.

Respondents in this case have, moved the court to dismiss the appeal and affirm the judgment below for various reasons, only one of which we shall notice. It is, that the brief of appellant does not comply with the laws of this state or with the rules of this court, in that it does not point out the errors relied upon by the appellant for a reversal, nor does it *387show that any error- was committed by the trial court, nor that any of the matters discussed in the brief were ever presented to the trial court for ruling or decision. The act of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lucas v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. MoffittIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Town of Waukon v. StrouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  4. Brown v. TollesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Robinson v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sengfelder v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Moore v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Chandler v. Cushing-Young Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Crowley v. McDonoughWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. In Re Foreman's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API