Legal Opinion

State v. . Freeman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The motions in arrest of judgment for uncertainty in the warrants and failure to charge the defendants with the commission of a crime must be allowed on authority of S. v. Julian, 214 N. C., 574, 200 S. E., 24; S. v. Williams, 210 N. C., 159, 185 S. E., 661; and S. v. Ingle, 214 N. C., 276, 199 S. E., 10.

Our attention has been called to no statute, county or city ordinance, requiring a license, to “engage in the business of employing peddlers.” Even if it be conceded, as the State contends, that under ch. 127, Public Laws 1937 (Revenue Act), any person, firm or corporation “employing the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. State v. . IngleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. State v. . JulianSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API