Legal Opinion

Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Headley Good Roads Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 2, 1922No. 7PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

This is an action at law instituted by Barber Asphalt Paving Company against Headley Good Roads Company to recover royalties under an agreement of July 8, 1919, authorizing the defendant to manufacture, use, and sell for the purposes therein mentioned bituminous emulsions manufactured in accordance with United States letters patent No. 956,009 to L. S. Van Westrum. The case has been tried by the court without a jury. A finding was made on July 13, 1922, in favor of the plaintiff. (D. C.) 283 Fed. 236. The defendant has moved for a new trial upon the ground of newly…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Bonding Co. of Baltimore v. Pueblo Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. President of the Bank of Vincennes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1823
  3. Victory Bottle Capping Mach. Co. v. O. & J. Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
  4. White v. LeeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1882
  5. Peck v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wynne v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Pic Inc. v. Prescon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1980
  3. Schutte & Koerting Co. v. Wheeler Condenser & EngineerIng Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Eskimo Pie Corporation v. National Ice Cream Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1927
  5. deStubner v. United Carbon Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API