Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between SCM Corp. & Fisher Park Lane Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1976PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

We hold that, for purposes of applying the Statute of Limitations, a landlord’s counterclaim to the tenant’s demands for recovery of overpayment of rent (where that counterclaim is based on the assertion that the lease between them should be reformed) does not arise "from the transactions, occurrences, or series of transactions or occurrences” upon which the tenant’s claim for overpayment of rent depends. Accordingly in this instance, the landlord’s attempted supplemental submission to arbitration of its claim for relief in the nature of reformation was properly stayed, on timely application…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Lentine v. FundaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. In re the Arbitration between Paver & Wildfoerster & Catholic High School Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Hanover Fire Insurance v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Bartlett v. . JuddNew York Court of Appeals · 1860

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. v. LuckieNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. GavinMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Washington Homes, Inc. v. Interstate Land Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Bowmer v. BowmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. 118 East 60th Owners, Inc. v. Bonner Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API