Legal Opinion

Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. v. Luckie

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1995PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*197OPINION OF THE COURT

Titone, J.

These two appeals arise from controversies concerning separate securities transactions undertaken by two securities brokers on behalf of two unrelated investors. The common issue presented is whether the Appellate Division in each case properly held that the timeliness of claims sought to be arbitrated pursuant to an agreement governed by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) is a question reserved to the arbitrators, notwithstanding the facts that each arbitration agreement contained a New York choice of law provision, and that, under New York law, Statute of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. Painewebber Incorporated v. Michael J. Bybyk and Joyce O. BybykCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Thea v. KleinhandlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  3. Global Financial Corp. v. Triarc Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Smith Barney Shearson Inc. v. SacharowNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Roadway Package System, Inc. v. Scott Kayser D/B/A Quality Express Scott KayserCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API