Legal Opinion

Hartley v. Tacoma School District No. 10

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1960No. 35299PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

— The respondent was injured when she fell on an ice- and snow-covered sidewalk, owned by the appellant city, which crossed property of the defendant school district. The latter was dismissed from the resultant action and is not a party to this appeal, which is taken from a verdict in favor of the respondent.

No error is assigned to the instructions, but the appellant contends that the evidence was such that a verdict in its favor should have been directed by the court, first because the appellant was not negligent, and second, because the respondent voluntarily assumed the risk of the injury…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hase v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Ellis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Titus v. City of MontesanoWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Niebarger v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Holland v. City of AuburnWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  2. Oakley v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Green v. DunkinWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Oakley v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API