Legal Opinion

Cardinal v. Leader National Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 12, 1990No. 89-1271PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Leader National Insurance Company appeals from a judgment commanding that it cover, for liability purposes, a permissive user of a vehicle, even though Leader did not insure the vehicle; it insured only the owner under a non-owner insurance policy.

There are three issues in this case. First, does the financial responsibility statute mandate that non-owner insurance be transformed into vehicle insurance? Second, did the SR-22 form sent by Leader to the state change the terms of the non-owner insurance policy to vehicle insurance? Third, does the omnibus statute, mandating coverage for all…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Limpert v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. School District of Drummond v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hartlaub v. Coachmen Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  4. Gross v. JoecksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cardinal v. Leader National Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  2. American Family Mutual Insurance v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  3. American Family Mutual Insurance v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API