Legal Opinion
E. Ingraham Co. v. Town & City of Bristol
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 28, 1959PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
In May, 1956, the plaintiff instituted this proceeding in four counts. It has agreed that all but the second and fourth counts may be treated as abandoned. The defendant demurred to the prayers for relief. Apparently before any determination of the demurrer, the parties entered into a stipulation for a reservation of certain questions. It is this reservation which is now before us. The basic facts are relatively simple. The plaintiff, a manufacturer, on October 1, 1955, owned real and personal property, all liable to taxation in Bristol. The real property was assessed at 50 per cent of its…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Bridgeport v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Cohn v. City & Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Lomas & Nettleton Co. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Town of OxfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Borough of Fenwick v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hutensky v. Town of AvonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Wilson v. KelleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Konover v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- O'BRIEN v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Second Stone Ridge Cooperative Corp. v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.