Legal Opinion

Reed v. ST CLAIR RUBBER CO.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 1982No. Docket 56603PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

Third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment was granted in the St. Clair County Circuit Court for third-party plaintiffs failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Defendant third-party plaintiff now appeals as of right. For purposes of this opinion, defendant third-party plaintiff will hereinafter be referred to as "St. Clair Rubber” and third-party defendant will be referred to as "Hoover”.

On August 3, 1976, an explosion occurred at Hoover’s chemical and adhesive factory in Port Huron. Plaintiff and several others, employees of Hoover, were performing their jobs at…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Crowther v. Ross Chemical and Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Todd v. BiglowMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Dale v. WhitemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Partrich v. MuscatMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Borman's, Inc. v. Lake State Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Skinner v. DME CORPORATIONMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Gorelick v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Johnson v. BundyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Kekel v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API