Kekel v. Allstate Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs claim an appeal from a circuit court order granting the motion of defendant, Allstate Insurance Company, for summary judgment pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(1) and dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The trial court’s granting of the motion for summary judgment is affirmed.
The standard governing this Court’s review is stated in Reed v St Clair Rubber Co, 118 Mich App 1, 5; 324 NW2d 512 (1982):
"A motion brought pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(1) challenges the legal sufficiency of plaintiffs claim only. In Partrich v Muscat, 84…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crowther v. Ross Chemical and Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Todd v. BiglowMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Partrich v. MuscatMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Borman's, Inc. v. Lake State Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Attorney General v. Diamond Mortgage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Price v. Long Realty, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Carolyn Caproni v. Prudential Securities, Incorporated Terrance W. Sullivan and Ronald J. ChewningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Bell v. League Life InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Dagen v. Hastings Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.