Legal Opinion

Kekel v. Allstate Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 1985No. Docket 79106PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs claim an appeal from a circuit court order granting the motion of defendant, Allstate Insurance Company, for summary judgment pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(1) and dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The trial court’s granting of the motion for summary judgment is affirmed.

The standard governing this Court’s review is stated in Reed v St Clair Rubber Co, 118 Mich App 1, 5; 324 NW2d 512 (1982):

"A motion brought pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(1) challenges the legal sufficiency of plaintiffs claim only. In Partrich v Muscat, 84…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crowther v. Ross Chemical and Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Todd v. BiglowMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Partrich v. MuscatMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Borman's, Inc. v. Lake State Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Attorney General v. Diamond Mortgage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Price v. Long Realty, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Carolyn Caproni v. Prudential Securities, Incorporated Terrance W. Sullivan and Ronald J. ChewningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. Bell v. League Life InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Dagen v. Hastings Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API