Legal Opinion
Buscemi v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 6, 1984No. 83-5874PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOLOMON, Senior District Judge:
Michael Buscemi filed an action for damages against McDonnell Douglas Corporation charging that he was wrongfully discharged. The district court dismissed his complaint. He appeals; we affirm.
Facts
Buscemi was employed as a maintenance mechanic at McDonnell Douglas for fourteen years. He was a member of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (the Union), and was covered under a collective bargaining agreement between McDonnell Douglas and the Union.
In September, 1980, Buscemi was discharged by McDonnell Douglas for not getting along…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Ethridge V. Harbor House RestaurantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- District of Columbia v. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Vincent v. Trend Western Technical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Williams v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Cynthia Keehr and Bruce Keehr v. Consolidated Freightways of Delaware, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.