Legal Opinion

Blanck v. Sloane, No. 0054613 (Aug. 26, 1991)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided August 26, 1991No. 0054613Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM RE: MOTION FOR PREJUDGMENT ATTACHMENT OF REAL PROPERTY No. 110 On March 5, 1991, the plaintiffs, Rubin and Gertrude Blanck, commenced this action against the defendants Alan and Michelle Sloane seeking, inter alia, the repayment of a promissory note allegedly executed in favor of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs have filed a motion for prejudgment remedy whereby they seek to attach real property presently in the name of Michelle Sloane. The plaintiffs' cause of action is predicated on a document attached to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. McCahill v. Town & Country Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Wheeler v. PolasekConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  5. Landow Co., Inc. v. MaisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API