Legal Opinion
Amsinger v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 7, 2011No. 10-404 TPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSH, Judge.
Mr. Thomas I. Amsinger filed his complaint in this court on June 29, 2010.1 The fundamental nature of Mr. Amsinger’s claim is that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) breached an implied contract with plaintiff whereby the government was obligated to pay Mr. Amsinger a reward for information leading to the collection of unpaid taxes. The court has before it defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). Defendant’s motion has been fully briefed. For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Meidinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Tindall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026