Legal Opinion

Meidinger v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 28, 2020No. 19-1521Published

1Opinion of the Court

11n tbe Wniteb $fati.~s «:outt of §ebetal «:Iaitns No. 19-1521C (Filed: January 28, 2020) ) ROY .J. MEIDINGER, ) Claim for whistleblower award under Internal ) Revenue Code§ 7623; unavailability of a Plaintiff, ) remedy in contract because of statutorily ) mandated appeal to the Tax Court under V, ) I.R.C. § 7623(b)(4) ) UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) --------------) Roy J. Meidinger,pro se, Fort Myers, FL. Antonia R. Soares, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Depa1tment of Justice, Washington, D.C. for defendant. With her on the brief were Joseph H.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API