Legal Opinion
Magnus Harmonica Corp. v. Lapin Products, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 23, 1953PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
This is a suit for infringement of three patents issued to Finn H. Magnus which were assigned to the plaintiff corporation.
The defendant denies infringement, asserts the invalidity of the patents and counterclaims for unfair competition and for a declaratory judgment of invalidity.
The Letters Patent involved are as follows :
No. 2,373,129, issued April 10, 1945, of which the plaintiff relies upon Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7.
No. 2,407.312, issued September 10, 1946, of which the plaintiff relies upon Claims 4 and 5.
*943No. 2,416,451, issued February 25, 1947, of which the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- General Talking Pictures Corp. v. Western Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. Mimex Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Magnus Harmonica Corporation v. Lapin Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956