Legal Opinion
Dubil v. Rayford Camp & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 18, 1950No. 12403PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
Dubil, Hubik and Shores, the appellants, brought suit in the court below under R. S. § 4921, as amended by the Act of August 1, 1946, § 1, 60 Stat. 778, 35 U.S.C.A. § 70, alleging the infringement by Rayford Camp 1 of Patent No. 2,052,221 for a “Method of Preparing Fresh Meat” issued to Dubil and Hubik. Shores was a licensee under the patent. As a second and further cause of action against Camp the appellants asserted that he was guilty of unfair competition in simulating a trademark label “Chip Steaks” and using it for the sale of steaks, that trade-mark haying been…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Lincoln Electric Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1947
- Blanc v. Spartan Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Dixie Cup Co. v. Paper Container Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Monolith Portland Midwest Company, a Nevada Corporation v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Harry A. Pursche v. Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation, Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Harry A. PurscheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Purer & Company and Phillip Purer v. Aktiebolaget Addo and Addo MacHine Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Fahey v. O'Melveny & Myers Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. O'Melveny & MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- R. M. Palmer Company v. Luden's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.