Legal Opinion

Ratchford v. Proprietors' Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1989No. 88-452PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

Former R.C. 3903.07, as recodified October 1, 1953, provided in relevant part:

“The superintendent may, subject to the approval of the court sell or otherwise dispose of the real and personal property of the company, or any part thereof, and sell or compromise all doubtful or uncollectible debts or claims owing to the company, includ*3ing claims based upon an assessment levied against a member or subscriber of any company issuing assessable policies.” (Emphasis added.)

The merit issue before us involves the operative words “subject to the approval of the court.” Do these words give a trial judge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. In re the Liquidation of National Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. State ex rel. McDonald v. KroegerOhio Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dardinger v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue SheildOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Blakeman's Valley Office Equipment, Inc. v. BierdemanOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Intaco Equipment Corp. v. Arelis ConstructionSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1997
  4. Prosonic Corp. v. StaffordDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
  5. Mortgage Network, Inc. v. Ameribanc Mortgage Lending, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API