Legal Opinion

Equitable Building Co. v. City of Royal Oak

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1976No. Docket 21494PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, J.

In 1972, plaintiff initiated this action in Oakland County Circuit Court to have defendant’s zoning ordinance declared unconstitutional as applied to plaintiff’s property. The trial court rendered judgment for plaintiff, and defendant now appeals.

Plaintiff’s property, purchased in 1964 for approximately $40,000, consists of approximately 2.3 acres of undeveloped land located in the northern section of Royal Oak. The property has been zoned single-family residential since 1957, and it is surrounded primarily by single-family dwellings. In early 1969 and again on later occasions, plaintiff…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re Brewster Street Housing SiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Scholnick v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Smith v. Village of Wood Creek FarmsMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  5. NeBoShone Ass'n v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dorman v. Township of ClintonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Kempf v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  3. Coats v. BussardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. In re Acquisition of Land for the Central Industrial Park Project, Parcel 755Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Kempf v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API