Scholnick v. City of Bloomfield Hills
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
This is a bill in chancery brought to enjoin the enforcement of zoning ordinance No 69 of the city of Bloomfield Hills. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiffs appeal. The essential facts have been stipulated and are, in part, as follows :
“That plaintiffs are the owners in fee simple of property described in their bill of complaint, located in the city of Bloomfield Hills, Oakland county, Michigan, described as follows: * * *
“Said property comprises 30.2 acres and is located on the southwest corner of "Woodward avenue and Hickory Grove road. The property has the shape of a trapezoid…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Austin v. OlderMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Northwood Properties Co. v. Royal Oak City InspectorMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Hitchman v. Township of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Fenner v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Dorman v. Township of ClintonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Spanich v. City of LivoniaMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- House v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. DeLeonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.