Legal Opinion

Scholnick v. City of Bloomfield Hills

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1957No. Docket 24, Calendar 47,175PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

This is a bill in chancery brought to enjoin the enforcement of zoning ordinance No 69 of the city of Bloomfield Hills. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiffs appeal. The essential facts have been stipulated and are, in part, as follows :

“That plaintiffs are the owners in fee simple of property described in their bill of complaint, located in the city of Bloomfield Hills, Oakland county, Michigan, described as follows: * * *

“Said property comprises 30.2 acres and is located on the southwest corner of "Woodward avenue and Hickory Grove road. The property has the shape of a trapezoid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Austin v. OlderMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Northwood Properties Co. v. Royal Oak City InspectorMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Hitchman v. Township of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Fenner v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Dorman v. Township of ClintonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Spanich v. City of LivoniaMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. House v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. People v. DeLeonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API