Legal Opinion
MacArthur v. O'Connor Corp.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided July 15, 2009No. C.A. 06-478 SPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WILLIAM E. SMITH, District Judge.
Before the Court is Third-party Defendant, Hartford Fire Insurance Company’s, Motion for Summary Judgment. In the underlying third-party action for breach of contract, the Third-party Plaintiffs (collectively “O’Connor”) allege that the Hartford Fire Insurance Company has a duty to defend and/or indemnify them in a negligence action brought by John MacArthur. 1 O’Connor believes that they qualify as additional insureds on a commercial general liability policy issued by Hartford to one of O’Connor Corporation’s subcontractors, The Berlin…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Cadle Co. v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Daniel J. Roche Et Ux. Valerie Roche v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Vineberg v. BissonnetteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Pro Con, Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2011
- Pro Con, Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2011
- Edwin Domenech et al. v. ESJ Resort LLC et al.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2026