Legal Opinion

Woods, Housing Expediter v. Pielet

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 28, 1951No. 10222PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJOR, Chief Judge. .

This is an appeal from two judgments, entered May 19, 1950, in separate suits instituted under the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1881, et seq. One judgment was entered in an action instituted by the Housing Expediter under Sec. 206 of the Act, and enjoined the defendants from accepting or receiving rent in excess of the maximum rent established and prescribed by the Act and directed that the defendants make refund to thirty designated tenants in the total amount of $3,351.15. The other judgment was entered in an action instituted by S.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woods v. Oak Park Chateau CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  2. Brownstein v. HaskellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  3. Bowles v. Mannie & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  4. Small v. SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  5. Adler v. Northern Hotel Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  2. Swanson ex rel. Peoria Service Co. v. American Consumer Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Ziomek and 10 Other CasesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  4. Swanson v. American Consumer IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API