Legal Opinion

Stolfo v. Kernodle

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 1995No. COA94-360PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Judge.

The plaintiffs present two issues on appeal: (1) whether a landlord renting limited residential properties operates in or affects commerce as a matter of law; and (2) if there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the defendants in this case were operating in or affecting commerce. This case is resolved by our decision under the first issue and we need not address the second issue. For the reasons stated below, we reverse.

Defendant Ruby Kernodle owns a house in Elon College, North Carolina that she has rented to three different families since 1987. Her tenants…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bhatti v. BucklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Love v. PressleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. United Virginia Bank v. Air-Lift Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Rosenthal v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Foy v. SpinksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carcano v. JBSS, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. MacFadden v. LoufCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Birmingham v. H&H Home Consultants & Designs, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Central National Gottesman Inc. v. Nakos Paper Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021
  5. Ellis-Barr v. CP/DB Housing Partners XIII, L.P.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API