Legal Opinion
Acadia Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 25, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.
[¶ 1] The plaintiffs, Maine automobile dealers (Dealers) who sell motor vehicles manufactured by the Ford Motor Company, appeal from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Marsano, J.) in favor of Ford on the Dealers’ claim that Ford’s “warranty parity surcharge” violates 10 M.R.S.A. § 1176 (1997 & Supp.2001). The Dealers contend that the court erred by finding, as a matter of law, that the surcharge does not violate section 1176. We affirm the summary judgment.
[¶ 2] The facts presented in the parties’ statements of material fact and the procedural history of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Acadia Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Great Northern Paper, Inc. v. Penobscot NationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Darling's v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Acadia Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1994
- Widewaters Stillwater Co. v. Bangor Area Citizens Organized for Responsible DevelopmentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alliance of Auto. Mfrs. v. GwadoskyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- General Motors Corp. v. Darling'sCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Darling's v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers v. GwadoskyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
- Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers v. GwadoskyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.