Legal Opinion

MUTUAL BEN. HEALTH & ACCIDENT ASS'N v. Moyer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 11, 1938No. 8583PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff brought action at law in the District Court for Alaska upon a policy of accident insurance issued by the defendant company. The policy, issued in April, ■1934, insured plaintiff against accidental injury, but provided that:

“This policy does not cover death, disability, or other loss * * * received because of or while participating in aeronautics. * * * ”

In October of the same year, the plaintiff, while a passenger traveling upon a regular commercial transport plane of the Alaska Southern Airways, from Juneau to Chichagoff, was injured in a crash. Upon his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Nashua Savings Bank v. Anglo-American Land, Mortgage & Agency Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. New York Life Ins. Co. v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  4. Bew v. Travelers' Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
  5. Begbie v. BegbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BowmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. Maier Brewing Company, a Corp. v. The Fleischmann Distilling Corp., Maier Brewing Company, a Corp. v. James Buchanan & Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. City of Bellingham v. Eiford Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. Jeffcoat v. Highway Contractors, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
  5. Davis v. Criterion Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API