Legal Opinion
Jeffcoat v. Highway Contractors, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 1, 1972No. 44649PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOX, Judge:
This is an appeal by defendants from a jury verdict for plaintiff and a court awarded attorney’s fee.
A statement of facts, as set out by defendants, is as follows.
On November 26, 1968, Highway Contractors, Inc., defendant, entered into an agreement with L. E. Jeff coat whereby plaintiff agreed to cut and fell timber on the Salt Camp Creek Watershed at Stroud, Oklahoma. The contract involved the clearing of 406.5 acres at $30.00 per acre.
On March 11, 1969, defendant entered into another agreement with plaintiff whereby he agreed to cut and fell timber on the Quapaw Creek Watershed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Phillips v. HA Marr Grocery CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Shelby-Downard Asphalt Co. v. EnyartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Begbie v. BegbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Igoe Bros. v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gilbert A. Cuneo v. Donald H. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Russell v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Boyd Rosene and Associates, Inc. v. Kansas Municipal Gas Agency, an Interlocal Municipal Agency City of Winfield, Kansas, a MunicipalityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Bankers Trust Co. v. WoltzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Sopkin v. Premier Pontiac, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.