Legal Opinion

Higley v. Woodard

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 1993No. 19275PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINMILL, Judge pro tern.

This is an appeal from a decision of the district court adopting the findings of fact and conclusions of law of a special master appointed to preside over an accounting requested by the plaintiffs 1 regarding the defendants’ duty to pay rent under a written farm lease. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

The relevant facts may be summarized as follows. Dale T. and Helen B. Smedley (Smedley) acquired fee title, through a land exchange, to 736 acres of real property near Salmon, Idaho. Smedley did not intend to use the property for farming and ranching purposes…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Rasmussen v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Clark v. St. Paul Property & Liability Insurance CompaniesIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Fischer v. FischerIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Rodriguez v. Oakley Valley Stone, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Papin v. PapinIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Cook v. State, Department of TransportationIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. United States v. Hagerman Water Right Owners, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Bruce Byron Bedke and Jared K. Bedke v. City of OakleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In Re SRBAIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API