Legal Opinion

Hickman v. Cave

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1924No. 25,339PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*702The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action to reform a supplemental written contract concerning a sale of land and to enforce the contract as reformed.

It appears that on March 10, 1921, the plaintiff purchased from defendants, a partnership, a quarter section of Logan county land, for $6,000, on term payments. Pursuant thereto plaintiff paid $1,000 in cash, when the contract was made; $500 in cash in June, 1921, and let the defendants have her share of the crop for 1921 which was sold for $650. The times when the first $3,000 should be paid were named in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. DarlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Harris v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Linn County Bank v. GrishamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Cox v. BeardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. Wing v. MollettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nelson v. SchippelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Andres v. ClaassenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  3. Federal Land Bank v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Gilbert v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  5. Jones v. CrowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API