Legal Opinion

Dodge v. Dunham

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1872PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from the Elkhart Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

—The appellee sued the appellants upon a promissory note executed by them, payable to one Stephen S. Millspaugh, for five hundred dollars, and by Millspaugh indorsed to the appellee.

The appellant Dodge filed a separate answer of six paragraphs :

First. The general denial.

Second. That the appellee was not the real owner of the *188note, that he had not the legal or equitable title thereto, and that Millspaugh was the legal and equitable owner of it.

Third. A set-off^ of various items, amounting in the aggregate to five hundred and thirty-eight dollars and fifty-six cents.

Fourth. That the note was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Curran v. CurranIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Turner v. SimpsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Blankenship v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Dickerson v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Johnson v. KentIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sefton v. HargettIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Kent v. CantrallIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Meeker v. ShanksIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Newton v. PenceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Stotsenburg v. FordiceIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API