Legal Opinion

Boutin v. Cumbo

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 31, 1966No. 65 Civ. 3857PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TENNEY, District Judge.

Defendant moves herein for summary judgment and to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds that the cause of action as stated in the complaint is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. There are no material facts as to which plaintiff contends there exists a genuine issue to be tried, the issue resolving itself into a pure question of law. The following pertinent facts are not disputed.

Plaintiff was and is a citizen of the State of Michigan, and defendant was and is a citizen of the State of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. C. S. Lenoir v. Porters Creek Watershed DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  2. Jones v. Greyhound Bus LinesNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Nielson v. Avco Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  4. Boutin v. CumboDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API