Legal Opinion

Boutin v. Cumbo

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 14, 1967No. Nos. 65-Civ. 3857, 66-Civ. 4416Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CROAKE, District Judge.

This is a motion pursuant to Rule 56 (b), Fed.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment and to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the cause of action as stated in the complaint is barred by the applicable period of limitations. This is the second such motion made by defendants.1

The facts have been outlined in the first summary judgment motion, Boutin v. Cumbo, 259 F.Supp. 12 (S.D.N.Y.1966), and need not be related here. There Judge Tenney denied the defendant’s motion “without prejudice to renewal upon sufficient proof of the alleged applicable provisions of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Snyder v. CluneUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Blackmon v. GovernDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1956
  3. Bealle v. Nyden's, IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1965
  4. Boutin v. CumboDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API