Legal Opinion
Albano v. Shea Homes Ltd. Partnership
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 3, 2011No. 09-15808PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Appellants’ petition for panel rehearing is premature because there has been no judgment. See Fed. R.App. P. 40(a)(1). Appellants’ petition for panel rehearing is construed as a motion to amend the certification order, and is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
The certification order of this court issued on January 3, 2011, is amended as follows: At slip opinion page 39, in the first full paragraph, the words “the motion to certify in” should be stricken from the sentence that begins, “The plaintiffs conclude .... ” The corrected sentence should read: “The plaintiffs conclude that…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Angel Soto v. Unknown SweetmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Kwai Wong v. David BeebeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Police & Fire Retirement System v. IndyMac MBS, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Genesee County Employees' Retirement System v. Thornburg Mortgage Securities TrustDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- U.S. Bank v. Sfr Investments Pool 1, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.