United States v. Mills, Duflot & Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 43292. [Oral argument Deo. 18,1919, by Mr. Hanson and Mr. Frederick W. Brooks, Jr.]-
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
This record presents for determination the proper interpretation of the word “.appliquéd” as used in import tariff legislation and particularly in paragraph 358, current tariff act.
The facts attending the processes of manufacture resulting in this imported article,- while not made certain by the record, are, within the radius of the concessions herein, sufficient for decision. In this particular the board in its decision states:
The official samples admitted in evidence consist of a foundation fabric composed of silk and ornamented by having a floral design applied thereto by means of some…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Krusi v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. Hamburger Levine Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- United States v. Heyliger & RaubitschekCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Greenwald's Linen ImportersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929