Legal Opinion

Plummer v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 25, 1949No. 26199PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GOODMAN, District Judge.

In this action, 'plaintiffs seek refund of estate taxes paid in the sum of $21,874.78 upon the ground that the Commissioner erroneously included in decedent Sanford Plummer’s statutory gross estate, the entire value of all property standing in his name 'at death'. (May 23, 1941.) The Commissioner’s alleged error, urged in a claim for refund, which was administratively denied, and reasserted here, is that such property was community property since September 17, 1939, (date of decedent’s last will) in which decedent’s wife had a present, vested and equal interest. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. MalcolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Kenney v. KenneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Estate of WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Morris v. Reclamation District No. 108California Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crocker First Nat. Bank of San Francisco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API