Legal Opinion
State v. Botkin
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 10, 2009No. 1 CA-CR 07-0083Published
1Opinion of the Court
200 P.3d 323 (2008)
STATE of Arizona, Appellant,
v.
Sean Wayne BOTKIN, Appellee.
No. 1 CA-CR 07-0083.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E.
July 31, 2008.
Review Granted in Part February 10, 2009.
Andrew P. Thomas, Maricopa County Attorney By David E. Wood, Deputy County Attorney, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellant.
Osborn Maledon, P.A. by Larry A. Hammond, Timothy J. Eckstein, Diane M. Meyers, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellee.
OPINION
GEMMILL, Judge.
¶ 1 The fundamental issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court acted within its authority when, after finding Defendant Sean Wayne…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. DawsonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Maricopa County Superior Court Number MH 2001-001139Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Maycock v. Asilomar Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Pinal Vista Properties, L.L.C. v. TurnbullCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.