Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Pleasure House, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 12, 1971No. 70-127PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Per curiam
The appellants seek review of a temporary restraining order entered by a single district judge in a case certified for presentation to a statutory three-judge court. The order, inter alia, stayed a pending prosecution of the appellees under certain state obscenity laws and temporarily restrained further enforcement of the laws against the appellees. It was entered by the District Judge shortly after he had certified a request for designation of a three-judge court to hear the appellees’ suit for permanent declaratory and injunctive relief. Under 28 U. S. C. § 2284 (3), a single district judge…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Schackman v. ArneberghSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ex Parte Metropolitan Water Co. of West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- McLucas v. DeChamplainSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hamilton v. NakaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Hamilton v. NakaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Martin P. Marston v. R. M. Oliver, Superintendent of the Virginia State FarmCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Morrill v. WeaverDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.