Legal Opinion
Schackman v. Arnebergh
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 29, 1967No. 1186PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants seek review by this Court of the refusal by the District Court to convene a three-judge District Court pursuant to 28 U. S. C. §§ 2281-2284. We have held that such review is available in the Court of Appeals, Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U. S. 713, and not in this Court. Buchanan v. Rhodes, 385 U. S. 3.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
3Cited by75 opinions
- David M. Foster v. Lawrence J. Walsh, Clerk, Akron Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Claudine Hall v. Sylvia GarsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Gonzalez v. Automatic Employees Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Robert H. Hargrave v. Shellie McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Maryland Citizens for a Representative General Assembly v. Governor of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.