Legal Opinion

Rose v. National Auction Group

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2002No. Docket 116600Published

1Opinion of the Court

646 N.W.2d 455 (2002)

George ROSE and Frances Rose, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

The NATIONAL AUCTION GROUP, INC., Andrew Bone, William Bone, Donald Boozer, Eddie Haynes and Eddie Haynes, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, and

Randall R. Hall, Defendant.

Docket No. 116600, Calendar No. 2.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued November 6, 2001.

Decided July 9, 2002.

Reeves & Fried, P.C. (by Hillard Fried), Okemos, MI, and James M. O'Briant, Corpus Christi, TX, for the plaintiffs-appellees.

Campbell, O'Brien & Mistele, P.C. (by Lloyd G. Johnson and Joseph Crystal), Troy, MI, and Daniel W. White, Alpena, MI, for the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Case v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Bein v. HeathSupreme Court of the United States · 1848

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API