Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Jack Ladd and Marie Ladd v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 14, 2013No. 07-271LPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Judge.

Rails-to-Trails Act; Fifth Amendment Takings; Notice of Interim Trail Use (NITU); Temporary Takings; End Date; Consummation of Abandonment; Railroad Use; Railbanking; Trail Use; Unencumbered Property Rights; Calculation of Damages

ORDER AND OPINION

Plaintiffs sued the United States, alleging physical takings of their reversionary rights to railroad easements on their property. The easements had been reserved for railroad purposes by plaintiffs’ grantors, and used for rail beds. San Pedro Railroad Operating Company, the owner of the easements, applied to the Surface Transportation…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Barclay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. Ladd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wellswood Columbia, LLC v. Town of HebronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  2. Ellamae Phillips Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Baer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  4. Balagna v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. Flying S. Land Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API